Corporations may now shout from the rooftops their political preferences. Ahoy hoy, all. I'm back with another provocative music-accompanied blog, but I'm a gonna stick the video behind the fold...
8:01 PM |
2 comments
Or in this case, roasted. Christiane Amanpour, CNN's international America-basher, anti-Israel, Muslim-terrorist sympathizer, gets absolutely hammered with her own words by Marc Thiessen, former speechwriter for George W. Bush. During...
7:34 PM |
12 comments
What an amazing news day it was today. Speaker Pelosi officially surrendered on ObamaCare. The Supreme Court gutted McCain Feingold and invited the likes of Exxon and BigPharma to enter...
7:26 PM |
7 comments
I stumbled today across the following and have some follow-on comments: Given that it's posted at well known Religious Leftist Jim Wallis' site, I can't be too surprised at some...
7:24 PM |
2 comments
Corporate Ship which was "Air America" finally founders long after rats abandon it.
5:29 PM |
23 comments
Popular TWO AND A HALF MEN actor, Jon Cryer, claims that a hitman hired by his exwife is out to kill him. Federal authorities are investigating this claim. Last week,...
4:21 PM |
0 comments
Buy or sell some stuff on Ebay. Go to jail. A Thai national who sold an ivory African elephant tusk on Ebay, and a customer who owns a donut shop...
3:23 PM |
0 comments
While reading Jay Tea's excellent post, Bring Obama his Brown Pants, something occurred to me. What has happened to our Dear Leader's pants? You may recall that they were once...
3:08 PM |
2 comments
Stay with this one folks: H/T Robert. Crossposted(*)...
12:52 PM |
5 comments
I'm cautiously optimistic as always but I think you can stick a fork in the current (Senate) version of Obamacare, it's done. Nancy Pelosi announced that she doesn't have the...
12:28 PM |
53 comments
Comments (3)
I wouldn't be so sure, the ... (Below threshold)1. Posted by azgregory | August 9, 2006 9:32 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I wouldn't be so sure, the democrats will likely make a legal challenge to keep DeLay on the ballot and if that doesn't pan out they will probably challenge every write-in ballot. Anyway you slice it a long legal challenge awaits
1. Posted by azgregory | August 9, 2006 9:32 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 9, 2006 21:32
2. Posted by Jim Addison | August 9, 2006 10:10 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I think DeLay can get his name OFF the ballot; that wasn't the problem. He wanted to get off and allow the Republicans to name a replacement candidate. That's what the court refused to do. The ruling was against the party, as I understand it, and doesn't force DeLay's name to stay ON - it only prevents him from being REPLACED. {Disclaimer: I did not personally read the decision, and am relying on characterizations in reports and commentaries around the time it was announced}.
This explains why the sudden push for a write-in campaign. The Democrat is a proven loser and the district is strongly Republican. The only Democratic hope was to keep DeLay and his legal problems on the ballot, or to keep all Republicans off of it.
I agree the Democrats will undoubtably attempt to challenge every write-in ballot if it appears the race might be close.
2. Posted by Jim Addison | August 9, 2006 10:10 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 9, 2006 22:10
3. Posted by BillyW | August 10, 2006 3:07 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
undoubtedly, the donks will try to challenge every write in vote. Good luck with that. This aint Flori-duh with a state supreme court that just kind of makes it up as they go along. Our Texas SC is elected and very conservative.
3. Posted by BillyW | August 10, 2006 3:07 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 10, 2006 15:07