As we've reported, the Republican nominee for Governor, Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, has been consistently trailing Democratic Rep. Ted Strickland, and may even be falling further behind. Enter John Francois Kerry, as David Hammer of the Associated Press reports:
Sen. John Kerry didn't contest the results at the time, but now that he's considering another run for the White House, he's alleging election improprieties by the Ohio Republican who oversaw the deciding vote in 2004.
An e-mail will be sent to 100,000 Democratic donors Tuesday asking them to support U.S. Rep. Ted Strickland for governor of Ohio. The bulk of the e-mail criticizes Strickland's opponent, GOP Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, for his dual role in 2004 as President Bush's honorary Ohio campaign co-chairman and the state's top election official."He used the power of his state office to try to intimidate Ohioans and suppress the Democratic vote," said Kerry's e-mail.
Read the whole story at the link above. Blackwell needs help, and fast. Maybe this ignorant bonehead inserting himself into the race with two-year-old crybaby whining will give him a boost.
Even if it doesn't help Blackwell at all, we shouldn't miss the opportunity to notice what a weenie John Kerry really is, and be grateful he lost.



Comments (5)
Blackwell is a well-deserve... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Steve | August 29, 2006 3:18 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Blackwell is a well-deserved 22 points down in the polls. Serves him right.
1. Posted by Steve | August 29, 2006 3:18 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 29, 2006 15:18
2. Posted by ZZ Revolution | August 29, 2006 3:43 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Oh goodness guys. You can't approve of Blackwell so you have to continue the john Kerry smear.
My o My...you really are frightened that people now trust Kerry more than Bush and any Republcan nowadays. And that people know now that the media and your rightwinged blogs lie instead of face up to the crimes of your own party.
Shame on you.
2. Posted by ZZ Revolution | August 29, 2006 3:43 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 29, 2006 15:43
3. Posted by Jim Addison | August 29, 2006 5:30 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I had heard that SAT scores were dropping.
Now I understand why.
3. Posted by Jim Addison | August 29, 2006 5:30 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 29, 2006 17:30
4. Posted by Steve | August 29, 2006 7:07 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Yes, SAT scores have been dropping because your Reichwing buddies decided that we can afford $10 Billion in tax cuts to oil companies, but we couldn't afford to fully fund education.
I could see why the Republicans don't want to fund education, as Bill Clinton said, "When people think, Democrats win."
4. Posted by Steve | August 29, 2006 7:07 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 29, 2006 19:07
5. Posted by Jim Addison | August 29, 2006 11:41 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Oops. You opened your mouth, and once more show your stupidity.
Bush's very first Education request was 25% higher than Clinton's highest. He's spending nearly double Clinton's final budget now.
Moron.
Before you open your mouth again and show more stupidity, yes, the "authorized" amount is not always requested, appropriated, or spent. It's not supposed to be, idiot - it's a maximum figure planned years in advance. Bush's spending still far exceeds the guy you choose to quote.
With Democrats as dumb as you, though, no amount of money is sufficient to educate.
5. Posted by Jim Addison | August 29, 2006 11:41 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on August 29, 2006 23:41