Charles Cook of the Cook Political Report says he sees no trend toward Republicans, and predicts Democrats still have a good chance of recapturing the House. His commentary is at Cook Political Report:
On an actual seat count, not factoring in any national dynamics or turnout advantage for either party, the fight for the House is right about at the tipping point of 15 seats. It could be as little as 10 or as many as 20, but a seat count of 15 is at the top of the bell curve of likely outcomes..
But for me, and many other analysts who have seen other elections that demonstrated characteristics like this one (e.g., 1994, 1982 and 1974), the upper end of that range seems more likely (or even higher). Why? Republican voters seem to be considerably less motivated than Democratic voters, there's a strong chance that there will be no losses of seats currently held by Democrats to offset gains, and a diminished financial advantage by the national Republican committees over their Democratic counterparts, just to name a few
Read it all at the link above.
He is covered with this projection for all outcomes from Democrats gaining ten seats and up. On the Senate side, he predicts a gain of 2-6 seats for the Democrats. Whether the Democratic voters being more "motivated" will translate to them breaking long-term trends and turning out in force for a midterm election remains to be seen.



Comments (13)
This is the tip off of flaw... (Below threshold)1. Posted by johnmc | September 25, 2006 2:47 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
This is the tip off of flawed analysis --
"and a diminished financial advantage by the national Republican committees over their Democratic counterparts, just to name a few..."
Based on the results I have been reading in the press the national committees funding is in a dead heat with a slight edge by the Dims. But the local funding by the Rep candidates is outpacing their Democratic couterparts by about $5:4.
Now if Cook doesn't have that right how am I expected to believe he got the rest of it right? 20 seats is the highest I have heared from any source.
1. Posted by johnmc | September 25, 2006 2:47 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 25, 2006 14:47
2. Posted by Steve_in_Corona | September 25, 2006 3:21 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
And 2-6 Senate seat gain for the Democrats.
Talk about really taking a risk!
My question would be how many people (including us conservatives) do NOT think the Democrats will gain at least 2 seats in the Senate?
Hey, I predict either the Mets, Cardinals, Phillies, Padres or Dodgers will win the NL title and play for the World Series. (Sorry DJ - no Astros this year, despite the heroics of the weekend - but hey, that is where my 'expert' analysis comes into play)
2. Posted by Steve_in_Corona | September 25, 2006 3:21 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 25, 2006 15:21
3. Posted by The Exposer | September 25, 2006 3:25 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
This is the same guy who predicted a Kerry victory in 2004. Sorry, Charlie.
3. Posted by The Exposer | September 25, 2006 3:25 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 25, 2006 15:25
4. Posted by Gary Gross | September 25, 2006 3:31 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Can you believe that Cook gets paid for that analysis? Here's what stands out for me:
On an actual seat count, not factoring in...turnout advantage for either party, the fight for the House is right about at the tipping point of 15 seats.
That's like saying that all the extra votes that the GOP's GOTV operation don't count because we say they don't count. That's nonsense.
Besides that, Cook isn't taking into account the uproar happening up in Cape Cod, which might get Bill Delahunt fired this November because of his ties to Hugo Chavez. A friend of mine living in the area says that talk radio in the area was absolutely abuzz about the Delahunt-Chavez connection both Thursday & Friday.
That isn't factoring in John Murtha's impending defeat. Keep your eyes peeled the next 2 weeks for signs that things are breaking for Republican candidates.
4. Posted by Gary Gross | September 25, 2006 3:31 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 25, 2006 15:31
5. Posted by eddiebear | September 25, 2006 3:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I seriously think all Cook is doing here is trying to shore up and buck up the MSM in the face of good polling for the GOP since late August. The cBS poll last week seems now to be the outlier, and the Mediacrats need something to hold on to.
For the longest time, the Medicrats keep crowing about the "generic ballot" and Bush Job Approval. Now that both are going the GOP's way, they are now saying that doesn't matter. Almost like Zogby's claim in 2002 and 2004 about the "cell phone only" voters.
5. Posted by eddiebear | September 25, 2006 3:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 25, 2006 15:39
6. Posted by Jim Addison | September 25, 2006 4:00 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
For the record, here are the fundraising figures for the relevant party committees through September 15:
Source at Open Secretshttp://www.opensecrets.org/parties/index.asp.
What's $120 million or so between friends, anyway?
;-)
6. Posted by Jim Addison | September 25, 2006 4:00 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 25, 2006 16:00
7. Posted by Gary Gross | September 25, 2006 4:40 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
What's $120 million or so between friends, anyway?
Speaker Pelosi or Minority Leader Hoyer.
7. Posted by Gary Gross | September 25, 2006 4:40 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 25, 2006 16:40
8. Posted by Scrapiron | September 25, 2006 4:58 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
People who write books like this are also in the class that claims Hitler was their father. Say or do anything for the almighty dollar. The problem is the left wing are like a kindergarden class, anything the teacher says has to be correct. Going to be a lot of disappointed people in Nov.
8. Posted by Scrapiron | September 25, 2006 4:58 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 25, 2006 16:58
9. Posted by Ken Hupp | September 25, 2006 5:22 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I think eddiebear sums it up nicely. This is precisely the kind of fear and panic that would we can expect to see creep into the MSM and Dem cheerleaders like Charlie Cook as evidence mounts that their hoped for Democrat takeoever of Congress is becoming more and more unlikely. Last week's CBS poll showing a 15-point generic ballot advantage for the Dems was another example. Look for more of this to be trotted out there as election day approaches in an effort to manufacture Democrat momentum, while ignoring evidence to the contrary. In the meantime, post this stuff if you need any extra motivation to donate money, make phone calls, knock on doors and anything else necessary to win on election day. And keep it handy, if as I suspect, right before the election, Cook and his fellow travelers change their tune, based on some major, last minute shift in voter sentiment that they claim nobody saw coming, which now suggests that the GOP will hold the house and senate.
Ken
9. Posted by Ken Hupp | September 25, 2006 5:22 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 25, 2006 17:22
10. Posted by Logan | September 26, 2006 1:40 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I think it is most telling that the spread is that big only 6 weeks out from the election. The election is definetly trending Democrat, but it's hard to wager a guess by how much. I think 15 is a bit of a reach. Personally, i would put the over/under at about 12 house seats and 4-5 Senate seats. Is it possible for 15+ seats to change hands? Yes, but i just don't see guys like Heath Shuler (NC) , Joe Donnelly and Brad Ellsworth(IN), and Ken Lucas (KY) all being able to force out Republican incumbants in Red states. There would have to be a clean sweep for the Dems to take back Congress and i just don't see it.
10. Posted by Logan | September 26, 2006 1:40 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 26, 2006 13:40
11. Posted by Chris | September 26, 2006 7:01 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
With the continual flow of bad news the GOP keeps getting, the latest being this intelligence report from his own administration stating that the Iraq War is one of the causes of additional terrorism, it could be that painful. It doesn't take a lot of independent votes to swing a race. If the news stays this bad, you might even see races like Arizona with Carter getting competetive.
11. Posted by Chris | September 26, 2006 7:01 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 26, 2006 19:01
12. Posted by Jim Addison | September 26, 2006 7:40 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Chris, you better catch up on your reading. The report has been released, and that is NOT what it says.
Nice try for about 24 hours, though.
12. Posted by Jim Addison | September 26, 2006 7:40 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 26, 2006 19:40
13. Posted by Raymond Cheney | September 27, 2006 6:08 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
President G Bush is the most incompetent, (stupid) and embarrasing President in US history, The upcoming mid terms will confirm this. At last the conservatives are waking up to this fact.
How many more great YOUNG soldiers will be sent to the slaughter-house in Iraq by this draught dodging and fumbling fool?
America is starting to wake up,at Last....
Ray, Australia
13. Posted by Raymond Cheney | September 27, 2006 6:08 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on September 27, 2006 06:08