Let's sure hope that this won't become all the rage, but not only Jeremy Scott's 2010 Spring Collection fashion show in London as well Kelly Osbourne all seem to channeling...
5:53 PM |
0 comments
Just like a bad cold or the flu, you just knew it was coming on. General Larry Pratt's outrageous song, "Pants On The Ground" has finally debuted on the BILLBOARD...
3:07 PM |
0 comments
... for the inevitable:Israel's air force on Sunday introduced a fleet of huge pilotless planes that can remain in the air for a full day and fly as far as...
2:56 PM |
7 comments
General Petraeus on our fight in Afghanistan:The head of US Central Command has said the current offensive around the southern Afghan town of Marjah is the initial operation of a...
2:33 PM |
6 comments
My cyber-friend Tom Graffagnino has sent the following to me and I thought many of you would enjoy it:So, Al's hockey schtick is broken....Al's "consensus" has been Gore'd.Al's Zamboni's just...
2:05 PM |
6 comments
...brothers who are captured and interrogated are permitted by allah to provide information when they believe they have reached the limit of their ability to withhold it in the face of psychological and physical hardship.
12:13 PM |
27 comments
Back in October, 2008, I wrote a post about how House Democrats were trying to find a way to nationalize the American people's retirement accounts by requiring that all Americans...
12:10 AM |
34 comments
Democrats and their enablers in the media are exulting at the results of the CPAC presidential straw poll that declared Ron Paul the winner of the conference's meeting this weekend....
7:49 PM |
25 comments
The new bigger and wider 2010 three wheeled Can-Am Spyder RT-S touring motorcycle is an interesting package. With prices ranging from $20,999 to $24,999, the Spyder RT-S includes a vast...
5:24 PM |
0 comments
Pop singer Huey Lewis was apparently not invited to join in on latest version of "We Are The World". So, he decided to take matters into his own hands and...
3:48 PM |
0 comments
Comments (5)
Two points:Given t... (Below threshold)1. Posted by eddie bear | October 29, 2006 11:15 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Two points:
Given the liberal tilt of R2000, this poll actually mirrors other Post Michael J Fox results which show Talent gaining ground.
As for the Liberatrians, they are just people who only seem to want to help sink Republicans (see the WA Gov race in 2004 and Realclearpolitics.com since Ryan Sager has joined). Why? I don't know.
1. Posted by eddie bear | October 29, 2006 11:15 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 29, 2006 11:15
2. Posted by clark | October 29, 2006 11:47 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Maybe because Republicans are screwing up the country?
2. Posted by clark | October 29, 2006 11:47 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 29, 2006 11:47
3. Posted by Kcredeye | October 30, 2006 9:01 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
....or, perhaps more people have taken the time to research Clair's voting record, and some of her personal past.....
3. Posted by Kcredeye | October 30, 2006 9:01 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 30, 2006 21:01
4. Posted by The Libertarian Guy | October 31, 2006 2:10 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
No, we don't run just to "screw up Republicans". Would you say the same for Greens running against Dems?
The two major parties view interlopers like the LP, Greens, Constitution Party, et cetera, as "vote-stealers". That implies an *ownership* of a vote, and, by extension, the voter him/herself.
Votes are not entitlements. They must be earned.
Why do we do it? Why do ANY third-party candidates/voters do what they do?
Because the Brand X parties don't offer a product we want to buy. We are being sold a bill of goods coming from two sales forces, and they both include the following components:
More government control, because Reps/Dems both consider Americans too stupid to run their own lives...
More government programs, because we can't make it on our own without food stamps, socialized health care, or being told not to run with scissors...
More taxes, to fuel the ever-hungry creature called "bureaucracy"...
More laws, when existing laws aren't enforced.
Before the "anarchist" tag gets mis-applied, let me be clear: Most libertarians want a SMALL government. By definition, an anarchist wants NO government. Huge difference.
I suspect the Reps/Dems don't like Libertarians, not because we espouse smaller government, but that we don't want *enough* government to make the Reps/Dems feel powerful enough.
Some of us refuse to color inside the lines, or to use our own coloring books. We're not freaks, just... different. In a good way.
4. Posted by The Libertarian Guy | October 31, 2006 2:10 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 31, 2006 02:10
5. Posted by The Libertarian Guy | October 31, 2006 2:14 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Sorry, forgot to put the whole URL in. Been a long day, and the coffee hasn't worn off yet.
BTW... is coffee illegal yet? If not, I'm sure some paternalistic nanny-statist will try to criminalize it. I want some trans-fat-laden food, too, but that's next to get the axe - for "the common good".
Speaking of the Food Police, someday we'll be reduced to grumpy, yet healthy, people who can't smoke or enjoy bacon, and forced to subsist on filtered water and boiled, unsalted tofu. Thanks a lot, busybodies.
5. Posted by The Libertarian Guy | October 31, 2006 2:14 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on October 31, 2006 02:14