Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani isn't letting Senator Hillary Clinton off on her questioning of General David Petraeus, report Teddy Davis, Jan Simmonds, Jennifer Parker, and Sunlen Miller for ABC News:
Giuliani accused Clinton of "playing into" a MoveOn.org ad that ran in the New York Times Monday that read: "General Petraeus or General Betray Us?"After co-host Spiff Carner said, "She's trying to tell us that she knows more about the whole situation than he does," Giuliani shot back by saying, "Doesn't it also sound like she's also saying that he isn't telling the truth?"
"I really do think to accuse a general of the 'willing suspension of disbelief,' particular in the atmosphere that Moveon.org has created with these terrible attacks, I don't know, I mean I think that's not the way in a responsible way to go about , you know, forging the foreign policy of the United States and the military policy of the United States," said Giuliani. "I think this name calling, you know, saying to people, 'willing suspension of disbelief,' and then saying the horrible thing they said about betrayal -- that is the last thing we need right now."
"What we need right now," he added, "is a reasoned account, we need statesmanship not political venom."
Read the whole story at the link above. Not only has Hillary not condemned the MoveOn.org smear, she apparently believes it.
Oh, well, perhaps it's all for the best. This helps her with the foaming-at-the-mouth leftists who evidently control the Democratic Party these days, and also gives people something to talk about besides her criminal fundraisers and laundered money.



Comments (1)
Uh-oh. Is the Ghoul's strat... (Below threshold)1. Posted by bryanD | September 13, 2007 9:28 AM | Score: -4 (4 votes cast)
Uh-oh. Is the Ghoul's strategy to be ever-"offended" a winning one? Alpha male to "concern" troll?
Does he have his granny dress picked out?
PS: Saw him on C-SPAN in Oklahoma City at a terror symposium. He pooh-poohed the destruction of his Terrorism Task Force HQ in WTC7, saying it "would have been too small" anyway.
1. Posted by bryanD | September 13, 2007 9:28 AM |
Score: -4 (4 votes cast)
Posted on September 13, 2007 09:28