Read more about what Thmpson needs to accomplish in the Michigan Debate at

http://azamatterofact.blogspot.com/2007/10/yabba-dabba-doo-fred-joins-debate.htm

Here's the evil. Populism didn't support the liberal talk radio. Answer: suppress the populism.

I'm tellin' ya. Soros is a monster.
==================================

"I'm tellin' ya. Soros is a monster."=kim

Mark Steyn at NRO's The *neocon* Corner:
"Sorry, no sale. The Democrats chose to outsource their airtime to a Seventh Grader. If a political party is desperate enough to send a boy to do a man's job, then the boy is fair game."
------------------------------------------------

Thompson: "Fairness Doctrine Makes No Sense"

Amid the Aw-shucksisms Fred's selling counter-conspiracies now.

Have you ever seen "A Face In the Crowd"?

The Frost's Progressive life is not worth living; it is unexamined. Public health is good enough for their children but not public schools? Taxes are for other people?
=============================

Ugh! *sophists: spit!...*
45K combined income in MD
(Tony Snow couldn't "survive" there on $160K.)
$55K house at purchase.
2 brain-damaged kids with education scholarships not in government schools (good!).

This pic strikes a popular chord:
http://www.sadlyno.com/archives/7418.html

Positive Ron Paul story in NRO(!!!).

On-topic because it mentions Paul campaign opposition research appetizers vis. Thompson and Romney.

The Romney one is a real OUCH!

The link:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MGVhODdiZjY5NDljNDA5NWUwYTY1NmJmZDBiOWQzM2I=

Sophists, spits.

45K combined income. Self-employed with little taxable income. Likely rich tax cheats. What's the house worth now? How much tuition per year. It's 40K. C'mon, bd, you're sounding like a propagandist not a thinker.

Brain damaged? Not in public schools? Sometimes I think you ought to examine your own assumptions just a little more rigourously. All the more reason to think this bit was fed you. Are you feeling useful?
====================================

I'll support the "fairness doctrine" as long as it's applies to broadcast televsion as well as radio. I'd love it if the CBS Evening News[sic] had 15 mins of Katie Curic's usual communist propaganda and 15 minutes of rebuttal with, say, Ann Coulter at the helm.

When ever I've heard someone ask of a leftist who supports reinstating the fairness doctrine "would you support this being applied to broadcast televsion, such as the network news?" The inevitable reply is "What are you talking about? There's no bias on the network news." And I am reminded that leftist neo-comms exist in their own fabricated reality.

The democrats have to push the fairness doctrine since they have no one in the entire party that can hold their own in a fight with a goldfish much less on talk radio. Dum De Dum Dum bunch of people, or it could be that the American people catch their lies within minutes when they start slandering and sliming everyone, which is all they know. That puts them in a tough spot.

Frankly, what the Fairness Doctrine supporting lefties should do is what they propose for all other things they do not like - boycott. Simply don't listen. While they wail and wring their hands over this they listen as much as conservatives do. And while they're istening, advertisers are reaching them. Instead, they act as if boycotting the advertisers will work. It doesn't. Advertisers will continue to pay for airtime because conservative radio has the listeners, both conservatives and liberals alike.

'Fairness Doctrine' assumes objective 'fairness'. Ain't gonna happen. Fair is a subjective matter, and something at which humans are pretty good. Humans know that censorship is not 'fair'.
========================