« McCain rebuts Romney charges | Main | Huckabee's pardon woes may just be beginning »

How to pass a stem cell research bill? Congressman Robert Wexler says indict VP Cheney

First I have to admit Wexler was my congressman for 6 years. The district I then resided in hadn't seen a serious Republican candidate for the seat since 1988 and still hasn't till till today. From the Palm Beach Post-

What do higher fuel-efficiency standards, expanded children's health care and improved relations with Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono have in common?

According to U.S. Rep. Robert Wexler, D-Delray Beach, those are just a few of the benefits America can reap if Congress holds hearings on the impeachment of Vice President Dick Cheney.

******

Wexler, who represents an ultra-Democratic Palm Beach-Broward district, recently took an e-mail poll of about 3,000 constituents and found 61 percent in favor of impeaching Cheney and removing him from office. Wexler insists he hasn't prejudged the matter but wants hearings to probe whether Cheney manipulated intelligence to bamboozle the U.S. into war with Iraq, which Wexler voted to authorize in 2002.

At last week's Palm Beach County Democratic Executive Committee meeting, Wexler took issue with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's declaration that impeachment should be "off the table." And Wexler disputed the notion that impeachment hearings would be a distraction, asserting instead that they would help the Democrats' domestic agenda and lift America's status abroad.

"The way we pass stem-cell research, the way we get implemented a children's health care plan, the way we get higher CAFE (corporate average fuel economy) standards to bring our energy debacle into a better condition for generations to come is to have impeachment hearings," Wexler said. "Because that'll get the president's eye. That'll get the vice president's eye. That for the first time will show that the Democratic majority is here and that in fact we have the courage of our convictions."

Wexler was certainly talking to a sympathetic crowd, so you have to weigh that when considering his statements. That doesn't make them any more outrageous. How are any of these legislative ideas going to be influence by an impeachment? Actually the side show an impeachment would create is likely to keep congress from getting anything done. Especially with another election coming up in less than a year. I won't even mention the downright the lack of reasons for impeachment also.

Congressman Wexler has won two of my coveted knucklehead awards, here and here. It's been over two years since the last. I do think he is overdue and therefore a likely winner tomorrow.

  • Currently 3.4/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 3.4/5 (5 votes cast)


Close

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


AddThis Feed Button

Comments (6)

Democrats do not have the b... (Below threshold)
sam:

Democrats do not have the balls to get anything done.

Wexler has to be one of the... (Below threshold)

Wexler has to be one of the most repugnant members of Congress - no small feat, with so many contenders.

There are others who are as far left as he is, but none with the evangelical fervor he brings to his own special brand of hyper-partisanship. I remember during the last two years of the Clinton Administration, before which I had been blessed by unfamiliarity with this cretin, when Wexler was on every cable news show that would have him to defend Clinton. One got the impression he would have elbowed Monica out of the way to scuff his own kneepads.

The problem of course natio... (Below threshold)

The problem of course nationally is that redistricting is not going to happen till after 2010 and then it will cement safe districts mostly for Dems and a few for the Pubs left. Unfortunately, the House will still be in Dem hands. Wexler could not lose in his district because all his voters are solid lefty Dems. It is what it is. Ca. tried to change the districts and could not get enough ballot signatures to even put it to a vote. That is how far Left and Dem Ca. has gone. Unless the Pubs get tougher and more national in its outlook, we are doomed to even more socialist pacifists.

I lived in Wexler's distric... (Below threshold)

I lived in Wexler's district from 1996-2002. As you can guess, Florida districts are pretty fluid. They move around every redistricting.

However from 1976-2002 I was registered to vote in a district that was represented by congressmen in a straight line.

First Paul Rogers(76-78) I remember little about him
Dan Mica a moderate democrat from 78-88. I met Dan in the mid 80's.
Harry Johnston a moderate liberal democrat 88-96
Then Wexler

In the beginning this was a fiercely contested house seat. Mica had serious challengers in 78, 80, and 84. The Democratic tendencies of the district kept saved Mica. Mica ran for the senate in 88. Johnston ran to suceed him. A county commissioner named Ken Adams opposed Johnston. Adams had a name and plenty of backing. He lost 60-40. The seat hasn't been seriously contested by a republican since.

Note during this time I moved twice and did a stint in the Navy but remained registered to vote in Florida, using m y parent's home address. Went from Lighthouse Point to Lake Worth from 76-89, with an intermediate step in Boca Raton. Despite moving about 25 miles north and how fluid the district was, I kept these congress people as my house representative.

The district has changed, its gotten more liberal. I liked Mica, liked Johnston too. Wexler......you guess what I think about him.

BTW now I live in the district represented by Ron Klein and formerly by Clay Shaw.

Bill

Wexler, or ANY Democrat "ba... (Below threshold)
ProfessorVP:

Wexler, or ANY Democrat "bamboozled" into invading Iraq? Hey, I am not a senator or congressman, have no connections nor was privy to any intelligence, and don't even claim to be the world's brightest person. Yet I knew Saddam was no threat, and the invasion had nothing to do with WMDs.

Not to mention that recent ... (Below threshold)

Not to mention that recent developments have made "embryonic stem cell research" superfluous, of course. If Congressional Democrats couldn't throw money at obsolete ideas, how would they fill all their earmark quotas?

ProfessorVP ~ Of course, Bush clearly stated we needed to take out Saddam BEFORE he became an imminent threat, and WMDs were but one of six justifications he presented to the UN in October of 2002, but don't let little details get in the way of your self-congratulation.




Advertisements






rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

politicstips@wizbangblog.com

Categories

Monthly Archives

Wizbang Politics Blogroll

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Editors: Jim Addison, Bill Jempty

All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

DCMA Compliance Notice

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Site Meter