This is only a temporary fix for 2007. From AP-
More than 20 million taxpayers will escape the alternative minimum tax this year, thanks to a stopgap measure Congress approved Wednesday. But lawmakers waited so late in the year to vote that many early filers could have to wait until March to get their refunds.You can thank the democratic controlled congress for your delayed tax refund next November at election time.
About 4 million taxpayers owed the AMT in 2006. As a result of the temporary fix, about the same number of taxpayers will owe the AMT for 2007, says Clint Stretch, managing principal for tax policy at Deloitte Tax in Washington.The AMT is a parallel tax system that eliminates many popular deductions and credits, resulting in a higher tax bill. It was originally intended to prevent wealthy taxpayers from using loopholes and deductions to avoid paying any taxes. But because it was never indexed to inflation, it's gradually expanded to ensnare even middle-class taxpayers who live in high-tax states or have many children.
Ordinarily, the IRS starts processing tax returns in mid-January. But the schedule will be delayed this time because the IRS will need about seven weeks to reprogram its computers to reflect changes in the tax law.
A permanet fix to the ADT is long overdue. Congress, both when the Republicans were in control and now with the Democrats in the majority, have delayed passing any fix. Another provision of the tax law I see as needing change is the $3,000 maximum for a capitol loss in any given tax year. That limit has been in effect 20 years at least, or since the days before I began making money preparing taxes. With inflation, the $3,000 is hardly adequate today, and one bad stock purchase can leave a person with a capitol loss carryover for a decade or more. Tell me about it, I got one that won't run out until 2010, on a stock loss from 2002.



Comments (7)
Unfortunately, the GOP will... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Glenn Koons | December 20, 2007 2:45 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Unfortunately, the GOP will not point out the failures of the Dem controlled Congress much like in 2006 when they did not attack the Dem's philosophy. Now, we know that the Dems are simply socialist-pacifists. Yet, the GOP doesn't seem on the attack. Even the Prez guys are attacking each other. Only Rudy has attacked the Dems and Hil and Obama. It is time for some unity in the Party or we lose the entire ball of wax.
1. Posted by Glenn Koons | December 20, 2007 2:45 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 20, 2007 14:45
2. Posted by COgirl | December 20, 2007 5:54 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
A possible fix to AMT would be go back to 1969 (or whenever it was enacted) and just inflate everything from there to current dollars. The problem with doing that is that congress has gotten fat and happy spending the AMT tax collections that never should have happened in the first place.
A political problem that I see is that the 20 million Americans who would have been hit had congress not done something, don't even realize that they would have been paying anything extra. (Kind of like a terrorist attack -- if it has been thwarted, do you even know it was planned?)
It's not an important issue until it hits your pocketbook. And this has been a hot button of mine for a number of years because I have been paying it. And I am not "rich".
2. Posted by COgirl | December 20, 2007 5:54 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 20, 2007 17:54
3. Posted by Bob Turner | December 20, 2007 9:33 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Well, before you blame the Democrats for the delay, remember they wanted to pass a bill earlier, that included a tax on some off-shore wealthy tax dodgers, to make up for the lost income. But the Republicans (even though a minority, they can stop things in the Senate) and Bush said no, lower taxes, keep on spending, run up the deficit even more. What happened? I thought the Republicans were the ones who always claimed to be conservative money managers, and Democrats the ones who ran up the big deficits. But for the last decade it's been the other way around, with the Republicans running around like a drunk kid with a credit card.
3. Posted by Bob Turner | December 20, 2007 9:33 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 20, 2007 21:33
4. Posted by COgirl | December 21, 2007 12:24 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Just a second. The exemption on the AMT would have gone down by $20K from last year if there had been no fix. A decrease in the exemption would have resulted in a potential tax increase of about $4K and it would have snagged more people. The Dems tried to offset the tax increase that never happened (nor was meant to happen), meaning they tried to pocket the additional taxes. It was all smoke and mirrors in order to get the additional taxes out of someone else's pocket.
If you don't understand how the AMT is calculated then you can't possibly understand why the GOP objected to what the Dems were trying to do. Yes, the GOP members who blocked this WERE being conservative money managers. They stopped a tax increase that never was meant to be there in the first place.
4. Posted by COgirl | December 21, 2007 12:24 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 21, 2007 00:24
5. Posted by Jim Addison | December 21, 2007 1:56 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
No doubt, had Bush fought the Republican Congresses and divided Congresses as hard as he is fighting this Democratic Congress, the Republic would have been far better served.
Until someone invents a time machine, however, we can't go back and change any of those mistakes. We play the cards we have today. As COgirl points out, there was a pre-programmed exemption in existing law which would have hit a lot of middle income to upper-middle income families very hard - their state and local taxes would no longer be fully deductible, in effect, because the AMT required a minimum federal tax on a given level of adjusted income.
As to "fiscal responsibility," I humbly submit that in a $3 trillion budget, we could rather easily find plenty to cut, alleviating any need for "offsetting" tax increases.
Start with the Toilet Museums, and go from there.
5. Posted by Jim Addison | December 21, 2007 1:56 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 21, 2007 01:56
6. Posted by COgirl | December 21, 2007 10:01 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Amen, Jim!
I think what people don't think about when it comes to fiscal responsibility that "as bad" as GOP might seem, imagine what the spending would have been like had the Dems had their way. Much of the spending approved by the Republican congress was a compromise (downward) from the level the Dems wanted to spend.
People in glass houses should not throw stones.
6. Posted by COgirl | December 21, 2007 10:01 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 21, 2007 10:01
7. Posted by Scrapiron | December 21, 2007 11:42 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Lay off the dem's. They need the extra pork to pay off their voters or no one would vote for them. They have no constructive idea's so they pass out the dollars. No dem wanted to get into the offshore accounts since the dem's are far and away the richest (money stolen from the taxpayers) in congress and most have millions hidden away in offshore accounts (pay no taxes), including Shrillary, Silky, Hanoi John and the Swimmer Ted. If the Hsu fits the democrats must wear it.
7. Posted by Scrapiron | December 21, 2007 11:42 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on December 21, 2007 23:42