Those who think Barack Obama is going to roll over to Hillary Clinton's pressure on admitting the Florida and Michigan delegates should probably study some of his past campaigns:
The day after New Year's 1996, operatives for Barack Obama filed into a barren hearing room of the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners.There they began the tedious process of challenging hundreds of signatures on the nominating petitions of state Sen. Alice Palmer, the longtime progressive activist from the city's South Side. And they kept challenging petitions until every one of Obama's four Democratic primary rivals was forced off the ballot.
In the story, you can read how Palmer had tacitly designated Obama as her successor while she attempted a run for US Congress. When that effort failed she tried to jump back into the race for her Illinois State Senate seat and was derailed by Obama's hardball tactics.
Don't be fooled by Obama's easy going style and his winning smile. When he has to, he can play hardball with the best of them. Palmer and three other candidates learned that the hard way:
A close examination of Obama's first campaign clouds the image he has cultivated throughout his political career: The man now running for president on a message of giving a voice to the voiceless first entered public office not by leveling the playing field, but by clearing it.One of the candidates he eliminated, long-shot contender Gha-is Askia, now says that Obama's petition challenges belied his image as a champion of the little guy and crusader for voter rights.
"Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago politics to remove legitimate candidates?" Askia said. "He talks about honor and democracy, but what honor is there in getting rid of every other candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?"
Honor? In politics? Politics is a blood sport as many Democrats discovered to their dismay during the Florida debacle in the election of 2000. Politicians who aren't willing to use every legal mechanism to their advantage shouldn't be in the game. Obama knew the rules and he used them as a club to defeat his opponents for the Illinois Senate seat before the primary election even began.
Given this track record, who in their right mind truly thinks he is going to capitulate to Hillary's tactics over the Florida and Michigan delegations? Everyone knew the rules going in and agreed with that those primaries would not count. Obama and Edwards even went so far as to remove their names from the Michigan ballot while Hillary cleverly kept her name on the ballot. For her to attempt to rewrite the rules at this point in the game is disingenuous and deceitful. By pressing this case she damages her own integrity and the prospects for the Democratic Party nominee (who will likely be Barack Obama) in the general election.
As Bill Jempty pointed out the only fair solution here is a revote for both states. Each state Democratic Party should begin organizing now to send out mail-in ballots to all registered Democrats in their state. This isn't impossible although it will cost some money. It's the right thing to do.



Comments (4)
<a href="http://ww... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Steve Crickmore | February 16, 2008 1:22 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The caucus idea might be the way to go, although the process, based on the campaign so far favors Obama. But I think it is going to be either this or the Clinton forces will end up getting nothing, if they think they will be able to reinstate the Florida/ Michigan delegates in an August Convention credentials fight.
1. Posted by Steve Crickmore | February 16, 2008 1:22 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 16, 2008 13:22
2. Posted by sam | February 16, 2008 1:38 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
If any change is to be made to the rules (caucus/re-do in MI and/or FL), it is only fair that the Dems should all over again. The rules about MI/FL affected the strategies of all the candidates, including Biden/Dodd/Richardson/Kucinich etc. True democracy.
2. Posted by sam | February 16, 2008 1:38 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 16, 2008 13:38
3. Posted by Scrapiron | February 17, 2008 12:08 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
How big a snow job will the black citizens take before they wise up. He won't help them and as his trillion dollar tax increase proposal shows he will send the tax dollars to the Arab countries by the boat load.
Mr. Obama is 50% Caucasian, that from his mother. What those who want Mr. Obama to write history by becoming "America's first African-American president" ignore is that his father was ethnically Arabic, with only 1 relative - a maternal grandparent, ethnically African Negro.
That means that Mr. Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side, and "43.75% Arabic", and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side.
3. Posted by Scrapiron | February 17, 2008 12:08 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 17, 2008 00:08
4. Posted by Steve Crickmore | February 17, 2008 9:41 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Obama better be made of stern stuff..The key may be not to avoid losing control of the Convention Credentials Committee, to Clintonites like Harold Ickes who will cheat as much as they have to
Now that he is Clinton agent he feels he has no obligation to honor those rules..This is the kind of old politician with no honor, that Obama would love to sweep away.
4. Posted by Steve Crickmore | February 17, 2008 9:41 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 17, 2008 09:41