« Newt Gingrich calls for a revote in Florida and Michigan | Main | Hillary Supporters Turn Their Guns on Bill »

Why Obama Won't Back Down Over Florida and Michigan

Those who think Barack Obama is going to roll over to Hillary Clinton's pressure on admitting the Florida and Michigan delegates should probably study some of his past campaigns:

The day after New Year's 1996, operatives for Barack Obama filed into a barren hearing room of the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners.

There they began the tedious process of challenging hundreds of signatures on the nominating petitions of state Sen. Alice Palmer, the longtime progressive activist from the city's South Side. And they kept challenging petitions until every one of Obama's four Democratic primary rivals was forced off the ballot.

In the story, you can read how Palmer had tacitly designated Obama as her successor while she attempted a run for US Congress. When that effort failed she tried to jump back into the race for her Illinois State Senate seat and was derailed by Obama's hardball tactics.

Don't be fooled by Obama's easy going style and his winning smile. When he has to, he can play hardball with the best of them. Palmer and three other candidates learned that the hard way:

A close examination of Obama's first campaign clouds the image he has cultivated throughout his political career: The man now running for president on a message of giving a voice to the voiceless first entered public office not by leveling the playing field, but by clearing it.

One of the candidates he eliminated, long-shot contender Gha-is Askia, now says that Obama's petition challenges belied his image as a champion of the little guy and crusader for voter rights.

"Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago politics to remove legitimate candidates?" Askia said. "He talks about honor and democracy, but what honor is there in getting rid of every other candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?"

Honor? In politics? Politics is a blood sport as many Democrats discovered to their dismay during the Florida debacle in the election of 2000. Politicians who aren't willing to use every legal mechanism to their advantage shouldn't be in the game. Obama knew the rules and he used them as a club to defeat his opponents for the Illinois Senate seat before the primary election even began.

Given this track record, who in their right mind truly thinks he is going to capitulate to Hillary's tactics over the Florida and Michigan delegations? Everyone knew the rules going in and agreed with that those primaries would not count. Obama and Edwards even went so far as to remove their names from the Michigan ballot while Hillary cleverly kept her name on the ballot. For her to attempt to rewrite the rules at this point in the game is disingenuous and deceitful. By pressing this case she damages her own integrity and the prospects for the Democratic Party nominee (who will likely be Barack Obama) in the general election.

As Bill Jempty pointed out the only fair solution here is a revote for both states. Each state Democratic Party should begin organizing now to send out mail-in ballots to all registered Democrats in their state. This isn't impossible although it will cost some money. It's the right thing to do.

  • Currently 2.3/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 2.3/5 (3 votes cast)


Close

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


AddThis Feed Button

Comments (4)

<a href="http://ww... (Below threshold)
Steve Crickmore:
The DNC has said it would allow Florida and Michigan to hold other contests, likely caucuses, that would comply with party rules. Top Democrats in both states have rejected that idea, including Michigan icluding Michigan Sen. Carl Levin, who fought for the Jan. 15 primary(and endorses Clinton).

The caucus idea might be the way to go, although the process, based on the campaign so far favors Obama. But I think it is going to be either this or the Clinton forces will end up getting nothing, if they think they will be able to reinstate the Florida/ Michigan delegates in an August Convention credentials fight.

If any change is to be made... (Below threshold)
sam:

If any change is to be made to the rules (caucus/re-do in MI and/or FL), it is only fair that the Dems should all over again. The rules about MI/FL affected the strategies of all the candidates, including Biden/Dodd/Richardson/Kucinich etc. True democracy.

How big a snow job will the... (Below threshold)
Scrapiron:

How big a snow job will the black citizens take before they wise up. He won't help them and as his trillion dollar tax increase proposal shows he will send the tax dollars to the Arab countries by the boat load.

Mr. Obama is 50% Caucasian, that from his mother. What those who want Mr. Obama to write history by becoming "America's first African-American president" ignore is that his father was ethnically Arabic, with only 1 relative - a maternal grandparent, ethnically African Negro.

That means that Mr. Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side, and "43.75% Arabic", and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side.

Obama better be made of ste... (Below threshold)
Steve Crickmore:

Obama better be made of stern stuff..The key may be not to avoid losing control of the Convention Credentials Committee, to Clintonites like Harold Ickes who will cheat as much as they have to

On Florida and Michigan, the (Clinton) campaign again said voters in those states should not be "disenfranchised" and that the states were important to the Democratic Party's fortunes. Ickes also said Clinton didn't vote on the DNC rules.

But Ickes did. And he voted in August to strip Florida and Michigan of their delegates as a sitting member of the Rules and Bylaws Commission.

"There's been no change," Ickes said, adding that he was then acting as a member of the Rules and Bylaws Committee "not acting as an agent of Sen. Clinton. We had promulgated rules -- if Florida and Michigan violated those rules" they'd be stripped of their delegates. "We stripped them of all their delegates in order to prevent campaigns to campaign in those states."

In fact, however, that was not why Florida and Michigan were stripped of their delegates. They were stripped of their delegates because they violated party rules by moving up their contest dates before Feb. 5. A pledge to not campaign in those states did not come about until one was put forward by the four early states allowed to go before Feb. 5 by the DNC -- Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and South Carolina. Clinton was the last to sign this pledge.

"Those were the rules, and we thought we had an obligation to enforce them," Ickes acknowledged today on the call even while trying to convince members of the media that Florida's and Michigan's delegations should not only be seated at the convention, but should also have full voting rights and that delegates should be allocated based on voting that took place in those states -- even though in Michigan, Obama's name did not even appear on the ballot and uncommitted got 41% of the vote to Clinton's 55%.

Now that he is Clinton agent he feels he has no obligation to honor those rules..This is the kind of old politician with no honor, that Obama would love to sweep away.





Advertisements






rightads.gif

beltwaybloggers.gif

insiderslogo.jpg

mba_blue.gif

Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

politicstips@wizbangblog.com

Categories

Monthly Archives

Wizbang Politics Blogroll

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Editors: Jim Addison, Bill Jempty

All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark.

DCMA Compliance Notice

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.

Site Meter