Those who get their news from television will be shocked to learn that apparently some voters are not swooning for Barack Obama, as Rasmussen Reports found:
Thirty-four percent (34%) of all voters say they will definitely vote for John McCain if he is on the ballot this November. Thirty-three percent (33%) will definitely vote against him while 29% say their support hinges on who his opponent is.Barack Obama has the same number who will definitely vote for him--34%. But, more people are committed to voting against him than McCain. Forty-three percent (43%) say they will definitely reject him at the ballot box. For 18%, their support depends on his opponent.
Read the entire article at the link provided. Hillary Clinton's negatives lead all major contenders (as she has for the entire campaign) with 46% professing to oppose her with certainty, but this is statistically within the margin of error of Obama's rating.
McCain begins the campaign with the largest segment of the voting population willing, at least, to consider his candidacy. Not bad for a fellow written off by most observers - including yours truly - nine months ago.



Comments (5)
I think McCain's VP selecti... (Below threshold)1. Posted by Alan Orfi | February 26, 2008 8:39 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
I think McCain's VP selection will be one of the most important in recent elections. If he chooses to join forces with a true, authentic conservative, he may actually manage to hold the entire conservative base -- and that's something I thought would be impossible. A unified Republican Party can win this election because, ironically, all of the McCain flaws we despise actually do help him with the crucial independents. I agree that Obama's negatives will continue rising, especially when he faces an opponent with DIFFERENT views.
1. Posted by Alan Orfi | February 26, 2008 8:39 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2008 08:39
2. Posted by Lee Ward
| February 26, 2008 11:44 AM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Once the Obama/Rezko relationship is fully reported and out in the open you will Obama's negatives sky rocket, helped along by Clinton, McCain, and Ralph Nader all banging the same 'corruption' drum.
At that point I expect the media's love affair with Obama to begin to sour, and we may finally see a balance approach to the MSM's reporting on the elections -- with Clinton, McCain and Obama all subjected to the same scrutiny.
Obama's free ride may have given him he lead, but his approval ratings may change dramatically in the next few months - further reason and incentive for Clinton to not give up the fight.
2. Posted by Lee Ward
| February 26, 2008 11:44 AM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2008 11:44
3. Posted by Glenn Koons | February 26, 2008 1:39 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
The AmericanThinker has a piece that says that blacks supporting Hil have been threatened for not supporting the Messiah. Perhaps other quirks will come out to show that Obama is just another socialist pacifist like McGovern or worse, Carter!
3. Posted by Glenn Koons | February 26, 2008 1:39 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2008 13:39
4. Posted by Lee Ward
| February 26, 2008 3:53 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
A year ago black voters were asking "Is Barack Obama black enough" because Obama's handlers at that time were doing such a great job of convincing America that he wasn't really black - that he was biracial, etc.
But that was the 2007 Obama. What we saw in January of 2008 was Obama's campaign systematically stealing away from Clinton the black support that she enjoyed, as they portrayed Obama as MLK reincarnate in South Carolina.
Yassuh, that's what he said ahl rite.
And what you will see next, once the nomination is nailed, is Obama moving away from his blackness with alarming speed.
All things to all people, all at the appropriate time. That's Obama. Now, if we only knew what he'd accomplished that qualifies him for the job of President, and if we only knew what he plans to do once he's in office...
4. Posted by Lee Ward
| February 26, 2008 3:53 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2008 15:53
5. Posted by bryanD | February 26, 2008 8:46 PM | Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Rasmussen is a gnome.
95% of Democrats will vote for whoever the Democratic nominee is against McCain because McCain is the established candidate of the party that implies that Democrats are traitors for not being Republicans or Joe Lieberman.
At least 10% of Republicans will abstain from voting or will vote against McCain for a whole slew of reasons that can be boiled down to bad government.
The majority of independents will vote against McCain for the same reasons as the 10% above whether seen from the perspective of right or the left.
Obama's negatives only matter within the context of Democratic nominating process (numbers! turn-out!), and fortunately for him he's harvesting the fruit of the GOP's 15 year anti-Clinton meme of gross venality, rape, and murder. These even may have given impetus for Democrats to realize the value of a reform candidacy if one should come along. It may have inspired Obama to see Hillary through GOP eyes and thus see a place for himself. Perhaps the occult meaning of Change pertains to the Clintons.
Either way, it's time to smell the coffee. The presidency is being decided among the Democrats.
A prediction: McCain will run a Bob Dole-style kabuki campaign.
5. Posted by bryanD | February 26, 2008 8:46 PM |
Score: 0 (0 votes cast)
Posted on February 26, 2008 20:46